Poll: Batch switching for media firms in advertising list
-
mdemircan2
- Level 4 user
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
-
maff
- Level 3 user
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 10:59 pm
- Location: BR https://t.me/captalismlab
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 5 times
Re: Poll: Batch switching for media firms in advertising list
There should be an option NO, I don't think there should be, as this encourages hiring a CMO and leaving him responsible for advertising, micromanagement after a while is really annoying, hiring a CMO for these cases would make us more comfortable decide on larger planning plans for the company.
-
Yimmy
- Level 3 user
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2020 1:27 pm
Re: Poll: Batch switching for media firms in advertising list
Maff wrote:
" ... I don't think there should be, as this encourages hiring a CMO and leaving him responsible for advertising, micromanagement after a while is really annoying, hiring a CMO for these cases would make us more comfortable decide on larger planning plans for the company."
Could you clarify your comment? I read it to mean that you believe the CMO is an existing option that should be used by all players regardless of their game play strategy and playing style. I also read it to mean that you think the CMO is beneficial because it enables the player to focus on other big-picture plans. It is entirely valid for you to support and defend the CMO option for your style of play. I believe it is much less valid for you to believe that the CMO is the best option for my, and or other players', chosen style of play.
I personally do not need a flawed CMO to show me how to "decide on larger planning plans" for my company. The reason I made the batch-switching suggestion is because the CMO consistently makes changes that detract and interfere with my larger game plans for my company.
" ... I don't think there should be, as this encourages hiring a CMO and leaving him responsible for advertising, micromanagement after a while is really annoying, hiring a CMO for these cases would make us more comfortable decide on larger planning plans for the company."
Could you clarify your comment? I read it to mean that you believe the CMO is an existing option that should be used by all players regardless of their game play strategy and playing style. I also read it to mean that you think the CMO is beneficial because it enables the player to focus on other big-picture plans. It is entirely valid for you to support and defend the CMO option for your style of play. I believe it is much less valid for you to believe that the CMO is the best option for my, and or other players', chosen style of play.
I personally do not need a flawed CMO to show me how to "decide on larger planning plans" for my company. The reason I made the batch-switching suggestion is because the CMO consistently makes changes that detract and interfere with my larger game plans for my company.